When Theory Meets Business Reality
The EU Taxonomy Regulation sets out clear criteria for sustainable economic activities. But translating the rules into day-to-day business practice is far from easy. Many companies quickly realize that compliance is not just about checking boxes – it requires cultural, structural, and financial changes.
1. Data Gaps and Complexity
One of the biggest hurdles is data. Many companies do not yet track the environmental metrics required by the Taxonomy. Emissions, energy use, water, and waste data are often scattered across departments or suppliers, making it difficult to provide accurate and verifiable numbers.
2. Supply Chain Dependencies
Even if a company is ready internally, alignment depends on suppliers. Without reliable ESG information from partners, businesses cannot fully assess their Taxonomy alignment. This creates bottlenecks, especially in global supply chains where sustainability standards vary widely.
3. Interpretation of Criteria
The Taxonomy uses detailed technical screening criteria that can be open to interpretation. Companies often struggle with understanding whether their activities “substantially contribute” to environmental objectives or “do no significant harm.” Legal and technical expertise is required, but not always readily available.
4. Costs and Resources
Compliance is resource-intensive. Smaller businesses, in particular, face financial and human resource challenges when building reporting systems, hiring consultants, or upgrading processes to meet Taxonomy requirements.
Turning Challenges into Opportunities
Despite these obstacles, tackling Taxonomy compliance can strengthen sustainability management, improve investor confidence, and enhance long-term resilience. Companies that approach these challenges strategically will not only comply but also gain a competitive advantage in the sustainability transition.